n
Budget Warwick, but perfectly playable
I compared this with a twenty year old fretless thumb NT that I had also bought.
Yes, the thumb is better, but I was nevertheless surprised that the fretless rockbass's quality was respectful for the price. The maple neck reminded me a bit of a better version of budget Cort/Yamaha necks I have tried in the past, but at this price, I imagine it would not be cost effective for Warwick to use more exotic woods.
One thing I did not appreciate was the choice of strings, a poor choice for a fretless bass.
In conclusion, I would recommend this bass if on a budget for a fretless, but also budget in a string change at the start.
Yes, the thumb is better, but I was nevertheless surprised that the fretless rockbass's quality was respectful for the price. The maple neck reminded me a bit of a better version of budget Cort/Yamaha necks I have tried in the past, but at this price, I imagine it would not be cost effective for Warwick to use more exotic woods.
One thing I did not appreciate was the choice of strings, a poor choice for a fretless bass.
In conclusion, I would recommend this bass if on a budget for a fretless, but also budget in a string change at the start.
2
0
Report
