B
Not for the RR..Description misleading :(
So, I got this with an RR, and figured out that the guitar doesn't really fit in..I mean, it kinda does if you are willing to push here and there, and you have to be careful when you take the guitar out, sometimes it messes with the keys and gets out of tune..This wouldn't happen with a 20eu thomann gigbag (which are really great, but there isn't any for an RR) and yet this one costs 49eu..just because it says Jackson on it? No, it's definitely not worth the money IF it's for an RR (and I guess the King V does NOT fit either, but I ain't got a KV so I can't really say..But I'm almost pretty sure it wouldn't fit) I don't know about the other Jacksons. Therefore, it is reasonable if I would call the description misleading, since the RR bearly fits in there. As for the padding..not thick at all and you would expect a lot more from a 50eu gigbag.
Anyway, I decided to keep it and deal with it, since there isn't any other gigbag that would, at least barely, kinda fit the RR..Can't really use the case since I ride around with a motorcycle.
Pros:
- It's a gigbag that says Jackson on it
(yeap, the only one I could find)
Cons:
- Description says that RR models fit, but they don't really
- Not enough padding
- Expensive for what it offers
Anyway, I decided to keep it and deal with it, since there isn't any other gigbag that would, at least barely, kinda fit the RR..Can't really use the case since I ride around with a motorcycle.
Pros:
- It's a gigbag that says Jackson on it
(yeap, the only one I could find)
Cons:
- Description says that RR models fit, but they don't really
- Not enough padding
- Expensive for what it offers
2
0
Report
M
It's great
Using it with a Jackson RRX24 and it fits perfectly. Owning it for 3 years now and no issues at all.
One thing which would make it perfect: If the bottom, where the flying V (guitar corpus) part is, would be more padded. Need to be a little bit careful when putting it down.
One thing which would make it perfect: If the bottom, where the flying V (guitar corpus) part is, would be more padded. Need to be a little bit careful when putting it down.
1
0
Report
S-
Fits a KV2 lengthwise... but hugely oversized widthwise
My old 00's style Ritter V case was way better than this. More substantial, more padding, and a much better fit. It wasn't designed for pointy bits though, so after 15 years, I had to pick up this Jackson gigbag.
And it's quite disappointing in comparison. Fairly flimsy, not much padding at all, and a terrible fit - they've went for a "one size fits none" approach here and it shows. My KV2s just about fit lengthwise which is fine but it doesn't feel secure because it's oversized widthwise. Not impressed.
If I could give it 2.5 stars, I would. Thomann's order process and shipping etc was top notch as usual though, even to a post-Brexit UK.
And it's quite disappointing in comparison. Fairly flimsy, not much padding at all, and a terrible fit - they've went for a "one size fits none" approach here and it shows. My KV2s just about fit lengthwise which is fine but it doesn't feel secure because it's oversized widthwise. Not impressed.
If I could give it 2.5 stars, I would. Thomann's order process and shipping etc was top notch as usual though, even to a post-Brexit UK.
0
0
Report
S
Absolutely amazing bag
Cheap and comfortable gigbag!
0
0
Report
G
Not exactly RR
I bought this together with a Jackson RR guitar, and it barely fits the bag. It can be used, but it's very tight and seems it could use some more space inside.
Aside from that, it's a great bag.
Aside from that, it's a great bag.
0
0
Report
KI
Does not fit Rhoads/RR type
I assumed that an original Jackson gig bag for Rhoads type guitars would fit a Jackson JS32 Rhoads guitar - I was wrong, though. No matter how I try, 2-3 tuning pegs are always sticking out.
The bag itself is well made, with good padding, but it fails to do the one job it had... Maybe it's fine for other body shapes, but don't buy it for your Jackson RR.
The bag itself is well made, with good padding, but it fails to do the one job it had... Maybe it's fine for other body shapes, but don't buy it for your Jackson RR.
0
0
Report
A
Jackson STD Gigbag for Warrior/Kelly/King-V/Rhodes
Well, its a nice quality gigbag with handy shoulder straps and two front pockets.However, there is a drawback, which is the cost. Internal padding could have more thickness for better protection, and there should have been some sort of head-stock holder. But the problem is that the gigbags for the likes of oguitars mentioned above are not easily available. That might have been the reason for high price.
Still, I would say, its a good tradeoff. If you don't travel long distances very often with your guitar, then its fine, buy it.
Still, I would say, its a good tradeoff. If you don't travel long distances very often with your guitar, then its fine, buy it.
0
0
Report
j
ok for RR shapes
pros:
light and versatile
cons:
padding could be a bit thicker
light and versatile
cons:
padding could be a bit thicker
0
0
Report
b
Jackson Gig Bag
Perfect Gig-bag, very high quality. I have been using it for years now and there is still no damage or anything wron with it. I would highly recommend it to anyone if they are looking for one.
0
0
Report
e
For this price it's quite good. I wish it was thicker, but overall it's good.
0
0
Report
